Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) & AI Citation Audit

GEO goes beyond crawlability: it measures whether generative engines see your site as a trustworthy entity worth citing. Our GEO audit runs 33 checks across entity authority, topical depth, factual density, and AI readability - the signals that decide who gets recommended - then layers on AI citation simulation.

33 checks + 4 AI intelligence features Knowledge-graph entity & trust signals Citation simulation and gap analysis
0+

GEO checks across 4 signal groups

0

AI intelligence features on the Pro tier

0

point GEO score with trend tracking

What this audit actually checks

Every check below runs on every scan. No black boxes: this is the exact coverage you get.

CategoryChecks
Entity authority8
Topical depth8
Factual density8
AI readability9
01

Entity authority

Generative engines build a knowledge-graph picture of your brand. These checks measure how complete and credible that picture is - so an LLM resolves you to one distinct, trusted entity.

Author bylines & bios

Verifies explicit authorship signals, such as rel=author and Person schema, that establish human expertise behind the content.

Knowledge Graph entity signals

Checks for @id identifiers in your JSON-LD - the field the Google Knowledge Graph uses to recognize your brand as a distinct entity. Without it, engines can't reliably resolve who you are.

Contact & trust signals

Looks for a verifiable phone, email, postal address, or ContactPoint schema. Generative engines trust entities they can confirm are real and reachable.

Social & sameAs links

Checks the schema links to verified profiles that help engines assemble your brand's knowledge-graph entity.

Brand logo detection

Confirms your logo is declared in schema so AI citations display your official branding.

Publication dates

Validates visible created and modified dates. Freshness is a citation tiebreaker for time-sensitive queries.

About page linked

An accessible About page is a core legitimacy signal engines look for.

Entity disambiguation score (Pro)

Scores how completely your Organization / WebSite schema is filled in - description, foundingDate, founder, sameAs, logo. Sparse data causes LLMs to confuse your brand with similarly named ones.

02

Topical depth

Generative engines favor sources that own a topic completely: original perspectives, coherent clusters, and depth over one-off posts.

Content depth (word count)

Measures whether coverage is substantial enough to serve as a primary source.

Unique value proposition

Checks whether your opening makes a differentiated claim ("only", "first", "unlike"). AIs prefer to cite original perspectives over commodity, rephrased content.

FAQ schema & sections

Detects FAQ content and FAQPage schema that map directly onto the questions users put to AI assistants.

Subtopic hierarchy (H2/H3)

Verifies a clear heading outline AI systems use to parse and extract sections.

Breadcrumb trails

Checks visible and schema breadcrumbs that reveal your content's topical structure.

Internal link density

Measures the topic clusters that signal domain-level authority to generative engines.

Content uniqueness indicators (Starter)

Detects first-person research ("we tested", "our data"), case studies, and expert quotes - the signals of original content LLMs preferentially cite.

Topical cluster detection (Pro)

Analyzes whether your internal links form a coherent pillar-and-cluster structure around a topic, the architecture generative engines reward, rather than scattered navigation.

03

Factual density

LLMs cite content they can quote confidently: clean definitions, dated statistics, attributed quotes, and inline-referenced claims.

Definition format detection

Looks for clean "X is..." / "X refers to..." definition patterns - the exact extractable format LLMs lift as a direct answer.

Data point density

Counts concrete figures, statistics, and dates, the raw material of citable content.

Statistic freshness (Starter)

Checks whether your statistics carry a year reference ("in 2025", "a 2024 study"). Undated stats get deprioritized in favor of fresher sources.

Wikipedia-style inline citations (Starter)

Measures whether citations sit inline next to the claim they support, the way Wikipedia does, rather than dumped in a footer - which dramatically increases LLM trust.

Quotes & citations markup

Checks blockquote and cite elements that make attributions machine-readable.

External citations

Verifies your content references sources. A bibliography signals research, not opinion.

Authoritative source links

Detects links to .gov, .edu and academic domains that pass trust by association.

Comparison & "best of" optimization (Pro)

Detects comparison framing (X vs Y, alternatives, pros/cons, "best of") - the single most-cited content type in AI shopping and recommendation queries.

04

AI readability

How easily can a language model isolate, quote, and attribute your content? Structure, formatting, and semantic markup decide.

Paragraph chunking

Flags rambling paragraphs. LLMs extract short, self-contained 2-4 sentence chunks cleanly.

Semantic HTML landmarks

Checks for <article>, <section>, <aside> and <nav> landmarks that let engines separate your primary content from navigation and boilerplate.

Image captions

Detects images wrapped in <figure>/<figcaption>. LLMs can't see images but they do read captions - the only part they can quote.

Data structuring (tables)

Verifies comparisons live in HTML tables that models parse without error.

List usage

Confirms steps and features are formatted as lists, the structure models reproduce most faithfully.

Pronoun ambiguity

Detects sentences that start with ambiguous "this" or "it", where context is lost the moment AI extracts a single sentence.

Multi-format content score (Starter)

Scores how many content formats you mix - prose, lists, tables, code, captioned images. Pages combining three or more are extracted more reliably.

Heading completeness (Starter)

Checks that headings are descriptive phrases ("How to Install Node.js") rather than terse labels ("Installation") - descriptive headings match how users prompt AI.

Structured summary detection (Pro)

Looks for a TL;DR, executive summary, or key-takeaways block - the section LLMs extract first as a direct-answer snippet.

The report

Everything your team needs to act

A score without a fix list is trivia. Every report pairs measurement with prioritized, copy-ready remediation, including AI-native fix prompts for your coding assistant.

GEO score across four signal groups, with an entity authority card and topic cluster map

Findings organized by plan tier - Free, Starter, and Pro - so you see exactly what each level unlocks

Every finding ships with a plain-language explanation, remediation, and an agent-native AI fix prompt

Citation simulator plus a prompt coverage heatmap (Pro) that maps which user prompts around your topic your content actually answers

Pro AI intelligence: citation simulation, Knowledge Graph gap analysis, a topical-authority depth map, and a competitive positioning report

Competitor GEO comparison to benchmark your citation-worthiness against rivals, with trend tracking scan over scan

From URL to fix list in three steps

01

Enter any URL

No installs, no code snippets, no DNS changes. Every audit starts from a single URL, yours or a competitor's.

02

Scanners do the work

Purpose-built engines audit security, SEO, AEO, GEO, brand visibility, and site health, with each check scored and severity-ranked.

03

Fix with AI-ready prompts

Every finding ships with plain-language remediation and an agent-native fix prompt you can paste straight into your AI coding assistant.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & further reading

Score your citation-worthiness

Run a GEO audit and see what generative engines see.